“The burqa is a weapon jihadist and has nothing to do with Islam.” Word of Imam English, which collects signatures to ban it
According to Taj Hargey, “the burqa is not a symbol of multiculturalism and tolerance.” The politicians do not act because “fear of being accused of” Islamophobia “,” but so “prejudicial to the rights of women”
“The growing fad among young British Muslims to wear the burqa (contrary to their mothers, who do not carry it) is one of the most sinister developments of our times.” It is convinced Taj Hargey, imam of the Islamic Congregation and the Education Centre of Oxford, who has launched a petition to collect 100 thousand signatures needed to be discussed in Parliament of an eventual ban on the turn with his face covered. A new initiative, because “it is the first time it is run by Muslims,” he clarified Hargey the Daily Mail .
RELIGION is not involved. Apart from making it a matter of safety arguments Imam reveal the deception of those who “pretend that this is a symbol of multiculturalism, diversity and philosophy of tolerance in our society.” This belief is “completely wrong”, in fact “the burqa is an archaic and tribal piece of cloth used by fundamentalist fanatics anxiously.”
Referring to the application, then lost, the Pakistani French at the European Court of Human Rights, who asked to be wearing the full veil for religious reasons, Hargey explained that “there is no religious obligation which requires Muslims to wear the burqa,” and that is not even “a peculiarity of Pakistani culture, where 90 percent of women do not wearing it. ” Where did you get then this custom? “It is a custom that originated in ancient Persia and Byzantium more than a thousand years before the birth of Islam. It was built by the aristocratic males for a reason of social snobbery and non-religious, since they did not want their women, wives, daughters, sisters or mothers were seen by the peasants. ” Despite this, the Islamic clergy today argues that the burqa is necessary, based on the belief that the wives of the Prophet Muhammad’s face covered up in public. The Imam, however, pointed out that this is not mentioned in the Koran, but only in some hadith texts “gathered 250 years after the death of the prophet.”
Referring to the application, then lost, the Pakistani French at the European Court of Human Rights, who asked to be wearing the full veil for religious reasons, Hargey explained that “there is no religious obligation which requires Muslims to wear the burqa,” and that is not even “a peculiarity of Pakistani culture, where 90 percent of women do not wearing it. ” Where did you get then this custom? “It is a custom that originated in ancient Persia and Byzantium more than a thousand years before the birth of Islam. It was built by the aristocratic males for a reason of social snobbery and non-religious, since they did not want their women, wives, daughters, sisters or mothers were seen by the peasants. ” Despite this, the Islamic clergy today argues that the burqa is necessary, based on the belief that the wives of the Prophet Muhammad’s face covered up in public. The Imam, however, pointed out that this is not mentioned in the Koran, but only in some hadith texts “gathered 250 years after the death of the prophet.”
“BURQA ARMA jihadist.” But, “theology aside,” the burqa ‘threatens social cohesion by inhibiting the effective interaction between Muslims and non-Muslims in the public arena. ” More, because it would also be “a real affront to gender equality,” much heralded by Britain. Recalling that any man who covers his face would be immediately arrested, Hargey pointed out that “in this case feminists should ask that men and women are treated equally. Or everyone has the right to cover her face or nobody has. ” Also because the burqa undermines “the health of women, who are never exposed to sunlight,” as seen in “a recent study on women Arab Emirates.”
In addition, those who want to hide their face “about freedom of choice, but it is not them who are given the freedom but to the men who impose their will. ” And this is not progress, but imprisonment. The burqa is just “another weapon in the arsenal of misogynist jihadists, as well as forced marriages, female genital mutilation and sexist discrimination.” Therefore Hargey insists that “we are tolerating, allowing a new form of apartheid female to grow between us.”
In addition, those who want to hide their face “about freedom of choice, but it is not them who are given the freedom but to the men who impose their will. ” And this is not progress, but imprisonment. The burqa is just “another weapon in the arsenal of misogynist jihadists, as well as forced marriages, female genital mutilation and sexist discrimination.” Therefore Hargey insists that “we are tolerating, allowing a new form of apartheid female to grow between us.”
IS NOT Islamophobia. But the “implications are enormous for public safety, after several cases of terrorists and criminals have used the burqa to evade detention.” All British, therefore, we should oppose the use of the full veil, because instead of bringing tolerance, “imprisons women, threatens social harmony, feeds the suspicion has serious health implications and puts heavy security at risk ‘ . In addition, this way of dressing would not have “nothing to do with Islam, but it is a cultural trend set by Saudi Arabia and backward from the fringes of the Islamic world.” Muslim and not, therefore, have a duty to “challenge the religious fundamentalists who have cynically exploited the British traditions of tolerance and individual freedom to impose their agenda biased and completely imported from the Arab Middle East.”
It is the fault of politicians who also ” despite the growing concern of citizens, “he” refused to take a position “because of” fear of being accused of “Islamophobia” by fundamentalist militants. Well, it’s time to put the needs of English society before those grievances built ad hoc by the fundamentalists, whose purpose is to replace our liberal democracy with a totalitarian theocracy, which uses the burqa as a weapon. “
It is the fault of politicians who also ” despite the growing concern of citizens, “he” refused to take a position “because of” fear of being accused of “Islamophobia” by fundamentalist militants. Well, it’s time to put the needs of English society before those grievances built ad hoc by the fundamentalists, whose purpose is to replace our liberal democracy with a totalitarian theocracy, which uses the burqa as a weapon. “
No comments:
Post a Comment