There must not be any kind of discrimination of a sexual nature…
With Christian De Benedetto local and national newspapers, websites, blogs, radio and television have spoken, often misinforming, what happened to the Institute of the Sacred Heart of Trento – public school (non-state) equal Catholic – including the director, Sister Eugenia Liberatore and a fixed-term employee that the school did not renew the contract of employment.
A very special issue, as it is an employment relationship, has thus become a “national case” simply because the teacher whose contract was not renewed the work has decided to bring his case to the attention of the press finding in the “Republic “a forum concerned to make yet another spot on the so-called homophobia. And yes, because the teacher in question is a lesbian and, precisely because of his homosexuality, would have been “discriminated against” by the nuns who run the Institute for Sacred Heart.
This would not only of a lesbian teacher but, as pointed out by Mother Eugenia, of a teacher who, during the hours of work at a Catholic school which is the Sacred Heart Institute, has repeatedly expressed favorable views of homosexuality. The causing all the outraged reaction of many parents who have strong complaints addressed to the director asking for action against conduct found to be inconsistent with the school’s educational project.
The Galaxy LGBT Arcigay and shouted to the persecution, the secular media have ridden the news under the label (now fashionable) homophobia, “Future” and “Sir” are reported to the shyness, the minister Stefania Giannini Inspectors sent by ruling: ” Where we were faced with a case related to a sexual discrimination would act with due severity . ” From CEI even a word, and so by his superiors Sister Eugenia. The Sacred Heart Sisters of the Institute of Trent were left alone, while newspapers and politics gave the worst.
In front of the verbal terrorism that he violently attacked the nuns “guilty of homophobia,” precisely those pastors who should defend the flock entrusted to them even at the cost of his own life showed the face of a cowardly hierarchy more and more prostrate in the world.
In so fearful silence Archbishop Archbishop of Trent. Luigi Bressan, however, spoke. thinks that the good Catholic Bishop of Sister Eugenia did hear his strong voice in defense of the decision taken by the nuns, to remind the Church’s right to teach in Catholic schools and teachers to select the second an educational project according to the Gospel, to denounce the violence of the media and the legal madness that hides behind the term “homophobia” as the diabolical LGBT agenda. None of that! ” There should not be any kind of discrimination of a sexual nature , “these, however, the words of Msgr. Bressan who has been summoned Sister Eugenia ” to clarify things . ” Yet St. John Paul II reminds us that the Holy Scripture ” presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity “(CCC, 2357) and that the homosexual inclination is objectively disordered (CCC, 2358).
The Bishop of Trent should know that a teacher who offers to students’ opinions contrary to the moral teaching makes a real scandal and that it is the duty of those who oversees prevent children being scandalized.If even a Catholic school can offer young people an education conform to sound doctrine, even if the Catholic schools must submit to the LGBT propaganda, meaning that they still have such schools (which would be Catholic in name only)?
The words of Msgr. Bressan are a triumph of politically correct , too bad that the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church teaches exactly the opposite reaffirming the right, sometimes even the duty, to discriminate against those who outwardly manifest their homosexuality.
Archbishop Bressan said that ” there must not be any kind of discrimination of a sexual nature ,” the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then headed by Cardinal. Ratzinger, instead teaches: ”The sexual orientation does not constitute a quality comparable to race, ethnic origin, etc.. compared to non-discrimination. Unlike these, homosexual orientation is an objective disorder and evokes moral concern. There are areas in which it is not unjust discrimination to take sexual orientation into account: for example, in the placement of children for adoption or foster care, in employment of teachers or athletic coaches, and in military service. Homosexual persons, as human persons, have the same rights as all other people (…), however, these rights are not absolute. They can be legitimately limited for objectively disordered external conduct. This is sometimes not only licit but obligatory. Include the homosexual tendency among the considerations on the basis of which it is illegal to discriminate can easily lead to regarding homosexuality as a positive source of human rights, for example, in reference to the so-called affirmative action or preferential treatment in hiring practices. This is all the more deleterious since there is no right to homosexuality“(Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Some Considerations Concerning the Response to Legislative Proposals on the Non-Discrimination of Homosexual Persons , 10-13).
The contradiction is obvious. What can I say? Just so sad to see a successor of the Apostles unable to bear witness to the Truth opportune importune , a bishop prostrate to the ideology of the century. (Christian De Benedetto)
No comments:
Post a Comment